Category: Mussar
-
Descartes, Newton, and Darwin and the practice Mussar (Matson’s critique on “positivism”)
Floyd Matson’s critiques of Descartes, Newton, and Darwin, as outlined in his works on the “humanistic revolt against positivism,” provide a rich framework for exploring how their ideas influence the skillful practice of Mussar traits. His central thesis highlights the reductionist tendencies of these thinkers and their potential to disconnect individuals from a holistic and…
-
Jungian archetypes, salvanut, and s.m.a.r.t goals
The Jungian archetypes, with their light and shadow aspects, can deeply influence the skillful practice of salvanut (patience), a central Mussar trait. Below is an analysis of how various archetypes can either support or hinder the cultivation of salvanut: The Caregiver The Lover The Magician Practical Application for Salvanut: By navigating archetypes with awareness, salvanut…
-
Cognitive Biases and the Mussar Trait of Savlanut (Patience)
Savlanut (patience) is a critical Mussar trait, emphasizing tolerance, calm, and the ability to endure challenges without reacting impulsively. Cognitive biases can both hinder and support the practice of savlanut. Below, I analyze how the 16 major cognitive biases influence savlanut, followed by full NVC OFNR protocol-based S.M.A.R.T. goals to address these dynamics. Cognitive Biases…
-
James Hillman’s Psyche and Polycentrism in the Practice of Anavah (Humility)
James Hillman’s Psyche and Polycentrism in the Practice of Anavah (Humility) James Hillman’s concept of psyche as polycentric challenges traditional, monolithic views of the self by emphasizing a dynamic interplay of multiple centers of meaning, archetypes, and influences. This perspective enriches the practice of anavah (humility) by fostering self-awareness, decentralizing ego dominance, and emphasizing the…
-
Cognitive biases that help and hinder practicing anavah with s.m.a.r.t goals
Intro Cognitive biases influence how we perceive ourselves, others, and our environment. Some biases can support anavah (humility) by fostering balanced self-awareness and relational understanding, while others hinder it by distorting perceptions and reinforcing ego-driven behaviors. Below is an analysis of 16 major cognitive biases, categorized as either helpful or hindering for practicing anavah. Each…
-
Comparison of Anavah (Humility) with Hindu Dharma, Sāmānya Nīti (General Ethics), and Amanitvam (Humility)
Mussar’s anavah and key Hindu concepts such as dharma, sāmānya nīti, and amanitvam intersect on their ethical, spiritual, and practical dimensions. However, their underlying metaphysical frameworks and goals reveal important differences. 1. Core Concepts Anavah (Mussar): Anavah emphasizes humility as “knowing one’s place” (makir et mekomo), balancing a recognition of one’s strengths and limitations within…
-
Comparison of Anavah (Humility) and Buddhist Anatta (Non-Self)
Mussar’s anavah and Buddhism’s anatta are profound concepts addressing the relationship between the self, others, and the greater reality. While both traditions explore humility and the reduction of ego, their goals, methods, and theological underpinnings differ significantly. 1. Core Concepts Anavah (Mussar): Anatta (Buddhism): 2. Goals Anavah: Anatta: 3. Theological Underpinnings Anavah:…
-
Six Thinking hats and s.m.a.r.t goals
Six Thinking Hats and Anavah (Humility) The Six Thinking Hats framework, developed by Edward de Bono, provides a structured method for approaching anavah (humility) by examining it from different perspectives: logic, emotion, creativity, caution, benefits, and process. Below is an analysis of how each “hat” can explore the light and shadow aspects of anavah…