Smart Jewish Studies

Cross-disciplinary studies that examine responsibility across cognitive neuroscience, sociology, and psychology.

—

by

Kevin
in , ,

Here is a ranking of recent cross-disciplinary studies that examine responsibility across cognitive neuroscience, sociology, and psychology. These studies offer insights into the interplay of cognition, social dynamics, and psychological mechanisms underlying individual and collective responsibility:

    1. Orianne, J.F., et al. – The Process of Memory Semantization as the Result of Interactions between Individual, Collective, and Social Memories
      • Summary: This study explores how cognitive neuroscience and social sciences merge to understand the encoding of memories and responsibility in individual versus collective contexts. The findings emphasize the complex dynamics between personal and social memories.
      • Read here
    2. Hollander-Blumoff, R. – Law and Psychology: An Introduction
      • Summary: Discusses the integration of neuroscience into legal settings and the psychological and cognitive processes that influence social justice and responsibility. It connects biases in human cognition with broader societal norms in the legal domain.
      • Read here
    3. Jamaludin, A., & Lim, T.A. – Neurophysiological Affordances for Assessment Design and Feedback: Biomarkers of Student Learning
      • Summary: This paper examines responsibility in educational contexts, leveraging cognitive neuroscience to assess learning progress and the role of feedback. It combines cognitive, social, and psychological perspectives.
      • Read here
    4. Verma, S., et al. – Cognitive Complexity and Decision-Making in Social Structures
      • Summary: Examines cognitive and social frameworks of responsibility, focusing on decision-making processes. It highlights cognitive neuroscience’s role in understanding social interactions and responsibilities.
      • Read here
    5. Larson, J. – Cognitive Approaches to the Monstrous
      • Summary: Discusses responsibility from psychological, philosophical, and cognitive neuroscience perspectives, analyzing human reactions to cognitive anomalies and social constructs of fear and responsibility.
      • Read here
    6. Fukurai, H. – Science of Norms as the Next Phase of the Sociology of Law and Socio-Legal Scholarship
      • Summary: Investigates how norms around responsibility are socially constructed, integrating insights from cognitive psychology and sociology to outline future directions for socio-legal scholarship.
      • Read here
    7. Shafi, H. – Healthy Body, Healthy Mind: How Exercise, Diets, and Socialization Slow the Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease
      • Summary: Looks at how responsibility in maintaining health affects cognitive function, using insights from neuroscience, sociology, and psychology to address social factors in cognitive well-being.
      • Read here
    8. Cavicchio, F. – Theoretical Foundations of Emotions
      • Summary: Merges psychology, sociology, and cognitive neuroscience to analyze how emotions play a role in societal responsibility, particularly emphasizing subjective experiences across social contexts.
      • Read here
    9. Weirich, C. – Using External Cortical EEG Characteristics and Visual Perception
      • Summary: This study examines human-centric feedback in cognitive-emotional interfaces, exploring the responsibility of designers and the psychological impacts of such technologies.
      • Read here

These studies represent contemporary interdisciplinary approaches, where responsibility is analyzed within societal, legal, and psychological frameworks, often drawing on neuroscientific insights.